Problem Based Learning

A letter to my consultants:

I am committed to being better. This is not an occasional goal or aspiration: it is me. Kaizen. I am not in competition with my future self but I am driven by an ideal self that may not be realised.

I have a great deal to learn and my learning progresses day by day. Learning is what I do.

I understand that protocols exist to standardise safe practice. Both standardisation and safety are important severally and together for many reasons. Standardisation should not mean petrification.

Auditing my own practice more intensively over the past 6-9 months, one of my goals has been to reduce my admission rates and to do so safely. So, I have paid more attention to the numbers and been more aggressive with treatments: keeping in mind that more aggressive action needs finer feedback, more acute monitoring – time is a resource that acts.

I have said many times that I am not invested in specific acts; I am invested in process.

We agree that practice should be informed by evidence and that evidence is sparse; however, we do generate evidence and don’t use it to inform our practices. When evidence exists to change practice and you don’t, it would be helpful if you could say what (achievable) evidence would be necessary to change practice. As consultants, ultimately responsible for safe practice in the unit, it would be considerate if in changing the management of my patients you did so because you believed it necessary rather than preferable. Art is always arguable: your interventions should benefit me as well as the patient. If you don’t change my mind about my course you won’t change my practice – and so you do me and my future patients a disservice if a change in practice is necessary.

Medicine is experiential; no book learning can substitute for treating patients. And guided, moderated experience always beats trial-and-error learning.

Thanks!